The caption presents an extensive critique of the image. The ethnographer mobilises the caption effectively: not only does he give us information we might need to contextualise the image, but he presents another set of voices which allow us to critically examine the image.
The caption is extensive already, but I'd like to know who made the second visual (or did I overlook this?). I'd also like to know a bit more about Kenneth and Tane, who they are, how the researcher met them, what they do. It is probably out of the scope of this medium, but I also am interested to hear more reflection on the choice to bring this visual to 'a critical audience,' in terms of how seeing this disturbing visual affected interviewees, and if the project includes any channels of feeding back the second image and the responses of the critical audience to the City of Austin employees who use this slide, as well as their responses to the image and to the critique.