Clifton Evers Annotations

Clifton Evers and James Davoll's picture
In response to:

What does this visualization (including caption) say about toxics?

Friday, February 28, 2020 - 10:02am

In my reading, I could make a link between how the production of place through race is arguably emblematic of how non-white populations become symbolic of 'pollution'/'toxicity' thereby diminishing the liveability of a place. A comparative analysis of marketing of cities and demographics can contribute to determing the racialisation of that liveability placemaking discourse. I am not really sure how the text about climate action connects in. I find the ties bewteen the different elements in the image somewhat vague. Or I am simply missing something. Sorry. 

Creative Commons Licence

Can you suggest ways to enrich this image to extend its ethnographic import?

Friday, February 28, 2020 - 10:00am

I would suggest working on a way to draw into the image a trigger for generating a reflection about toxicity and how some communities are constructed as 'toxic communities' or populations as 'pollutants'. Dorceta Taylor's work might be worth using as a source of inspiration? Or Mary Douglas's work. I don't mean to be negative but I connections vague here. 

Creative Commons Licence

What kind of image is this? Is it a found image or created by the ethnographer (or a combination)? What is notable about its composition | scale of attention | aesthetic?

Friday, February 28, 2020 - 9:57am

The image is a collected one (advertisement) of a city combined a graph prepared to illustrate the racial demographics of a city. The scale of attention is broad, but I cannot help feeling that it is so broad the ties to toxicity become vague. Nonetheless, the composition does provide an opportunity to think about how race, urban placemaking, and a liveability discourse are constructed. So, the comparative nature of the image is generative, so the composition works. Unfortunately, I had trouble finding any representational, compositional, aesthetic impetus that would produce reflection about toxicity and pollution.  

Creative Commons Licence

Can you suggest ways to elaborate the caption of this visualization to extend its ethnographic message?

Friday, February 28, 2020 - 9:50am

To be honest, I struggled with the caption. It is short and descriptive. While I previously mention relationships between populations being classified as 'pollutants' thereby there marginalisation framing the 'liveability' of a city I feel like I am imposing a reading of the image and caption . The caption could really do with some reflexive writing to link it to discussions/debates about population, racialised liveability measurements, urban placemaking, pollution, and toxicity.  While the image has text about climate action I cannot it is difficult to connect up with the rest of the image. 

Creative Commons Licence

How does this visualization (including caption) advance ethnographic insight? What message | argument | sentiment | etc. does this visualization communicate or represent?

Friday, February 28, 2020 - 9:46am

This image draws attention to how a discourse of how urban placemaking (and attendant marketing) is bound up with a politics of race. The image directly represents how a largely white population will be discursively linked to "best places to live". The production of place through race is arguably emblematic of how non-white populations become symbolic of 'pollution' thereby associated with the 'diminishing' of the liveability of a place.  Such populations become, as Mary Douglas puts it, constructed as "matter out of place."  

Creative Commons Licence